Fake-News

Fake News:Still Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack.

( by Ray MacGovern en ondersteunt door onze redactie)

AMSTERDAM-NOIR- Rutte:Code Rood Gifaanval op Nederland door Poetin(Video).
More than two years after the allegation of a Russian hack of the 2016 ‘US- Freak-presidential- election’ was first made, conclusive proof is still lacking and may never be produced. Maar nog steeds houden alle Westerse regeringsleiders inclusief de altijd liegende ‘Godfather Rutte’ van de VVD-misdaadgroep vol dat ‘ Capo di tutti capi Poetin’ in ‘US-Killer-Elite’ en  hun Westerse ‘Vazal- Staatjes‘ ‘Nep en Fop Verkiezing’ ingrijpt met Hacken en vergiftigen van het Westerse  ‘Klootjes-Volk'(kuch) (door de VVD Labbenkakken genoemd).

Amnesty International accuses US-coaltion Of Trump of War Crime in Syrië. Rutte:” Het is de schuld van Poetin”(Video) .

  ‘ CIA-Trol Arkady Babchenko’ aka “Jezus”: “Het is allemaal en altijd  de schuld van Poetin”(Video)

 America’s poor(Labbenkakken) becoming more destitute under ‘Mad Dog Trump’. Rutte: “Net als bij ons”(Video).

 If you are wondering why so little is heard these days of accusations that Russia hacked into the ‘US-Freak- election’ in 2016, it could be because those charges could not  withstand  close scrutiny. It could also be because special counsel Robert Mueller appears to have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged crime in Russia-gate as no one associated with WikiLeaks has ever been questioned by his team.

Uncle Tom-Showbizz-echtpaar Obama’ van het  ‘Grazy-Witte Huis’ naar Netflix(Video).

 

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity — including two “alumni” who were former ‘Killer-Elite-National Security Agency’ technical directors — have long since concluded that Julian Assange did not acquire what he called the “emails related to War Mongol Hillary Clinton& Pedo Bill” via a “hack” by the Russians or anyone else. They found, rather, that he got them from someone with physical access to the corrupt Democratic National Committee computers who copied the material onto an external storage device — probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS explained this in some detail in an open Memorandum to ‘War Momgul&TTIP President  Obama’ now realty Pulp Star by Netflix.On January 18, 2017 ‘President- Netflix- Obama’ admitted that the “conclusions” of U.S. intelligence regarding how the alleged Russian hacking got to WikiLeaks were “inconclusive.” Even the vapid FBI/CIA/NSA “Intelligence Community Assessment of Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections” of January 6, 2017, which tried to blame Russian President Vladimir Putin for election interference, contained no direct evidence of Russian involvement.  That did not prevent the “handpicked” authors of that poor excuse for intelligence analysis from expressing “high confidence” that Russian intelligence “relayed material it acquired from the Democratic National Committee … to WikiLeaks.”  Handpicked analysts, of course, say what they are handpicked to say.

Deep State,‘Mass Murder-Mad Dog Trump’& ‘Serial Killer& Drug dealing CIA’(video).

 

Never mind. The FBI/CIA/NSA “assessment” became bible truth for partisans like Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), ranking member of the extremly corrupt House Intelligence Committee, who was among the first off the blocks to blame Russia for interfering to help ‘Mad Dog Pimp-Trump’.  It simply could not have been that ‘War Mongul Hillary Clinton‘& Pedo Bill was quite capable of snatching defeat out of victory all by herself.  No, it had to have been the Russians.

WikiLeaks
It was on June 12, 2016, just six weeks before the Democratic National Convention, that Assange announced the pending publication of “emails related to Hillary Clinton,” throwing the Clinton campaign into panic mode, since the emails would document strong bias in favor of Clinton and successful attempts to sabotage the campaign of Bernie Sanders.  When the emails were published on July 22, just three days before the convention began, the campaign decided to create what I call a Magnificent Diversion, drawing attention away from the substance of the emails by blaming Russia for their release.Clinton’s PR chief Jennifer Palmieri later admitted that she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention with instructions “to get the press to focus on something even we found difficult to process: the prospect that Russia had not only hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to help Donald Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton.”  The diversion worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves. And like Brer’ Fox, Bernie didn’t say nothin’.

Meanwhile, highly sophisticated technical experts, were hard at work fabricating “forensic facts” to “prove” the Russians did it.  Here’s how it played out:

June 12, 2016: Assange announces that WikiLeaks is about to publish “emails related to Hillary Clinton.”

June 14, 2016: DNC contractor CrowdStrike, (with a dubious professional record and multiple conflicts of interest) announces that malware has been found on the DNC server and claims there is evidence it was injected by Russians.

June 15, 2016: “Guccifer 2.0” affirms the DNC statement; claims responsibility for the “hack;” claims to be a WikiLeaks source; and posts a document that the forensics show was synthetically tainted with “Russian fingerprints.”

The June 12, 14, & 15 timing was hardly coincidence. Rather, it was the start of a pre-emptive move to associate Russia with anything WikiLeaks might have been about to publish and to “show” that it came from a Russian hack.

Enter Independent Investigators,
A year ago independent cyber-investigators completed the kind of forensic work that, for reasons best known to then-FBI Director James Comey, neither he nor the “handpicked analysts” who wrote the Jan. 6, 2017 assessment bothered to do.  The independent investigators found verifiable evidence from metadata found in the record of an alleged Russian hack of July 5, 2016 showing that the “hack” that day of the DNC by Guccifer 2.0 was not a hack, by Russia or anyone else.Rather it originated with a copy (onto an external storage device – a thumb drive, for example) by an insider — the same process used by the DNC insider/leaker before June 12, 2016 for an altogether different purpose. (Once the metadata was found and the “fluid dynamics” principle of physics applied, this was not difficult to disprove the validity of the claim that Russia was responsible.)One of these independent investigators publishing under the name of The Forensicator on May 31 published new evidence that the Guccifer 2.0 persona uploaded a document from the West Coast of the United States, and not from Russia.In our July 24, 2017 Memorandum to President ‘Mad Dog Pimp- Trump’ we  stated, “We do not know who or what the murky Guccifer 2.0 is. You may wish to ask the FBI.”Our July 24 Memorandum continued: “Mr. President, the disclosure described below may be related. Even if it is not, it is something we think you should be made aware of in this general connection. On March 7, 2017, WikiLeaks began to publish a trove of original CIA documents that WikiLeaks labeled ‘Vault 7.’ WikiLeaks said it got the trove from a current or former CIA contractor and described it as comparable in scale and significance to the information Edward Snowden gave to reporters in 2013.“No one has challenged the authenticity of the original documents of Vault 7, which disclosed a vast array of cyber warfare tools developed, probably with help from NSA, by CIA’s Engineering Development Group. That Group was part of the sprawling CIA Directorate of Digital Innovation – a growth industry established by John Brennan in 2015. [ (VIPS warned President Obama of some of the dangers of that basic CIA reorganization at the time.]

Marbled
“Scarcely imaginable digital tools – that can take control of your car and make it race over 100 mph, for example, or can enable remote spying through a TV – were described and duly reported in the New York Times and other media throughout March. But the Vault 7, part 3 release on March 31 that exposed the “Marble Framework” program apparently was judged too delicate to qualify as ‘news fit to print’ and was kept out of the Times at the time, and has never been mentioned since  “The Washington Post’s Ellen Nakashima, it seems, ‘did not get the memo’ in time. Her March 31  article bore the catching (and accurate) headline: ‘WikiLeaks’ latest release of CIA cyber-tools could blow the cover on agency hacking operations.’“The WikiLeaks release indicated that Marble was designed for flexible and easy-to-use ‘obfuscation,’ and that Marble source code includes a “de-obfuscator” to reverse CIA text obfuscation.“More important, the CIA reportedly used Marble during 2016. In her Washington Post report, Nakashima left that out, but did include another significant point made by WikiLeaks; namely, that the obfuscation tool could be used to conduct a ‘forensic attribution double game’ or false-flag operation because it included test samples in Chinese, Russian, Korean, Arabic and Farsi.”A few weeks later William Binney, a former NSA technical director, and I commented on Vault 7 Marble, and were able to get a shortened op-ed version  published in The Baltimore Sun.The CIA’s reaction to the WikiLeaks disclosure of the Marble Framework tool was neuralgic. Then Director Psycho Mike Pompeo lashed out two weeks later, calling Assange and his associates “demons,” and insisting; “It’s time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is, a non-state hostile intelligence service, often abetted by state actors like Russia.”Our July 24 Memorandum continued:  “Mr. President, we do not know if CIA’s Marble Framework, or tools like it, played some kind of role in the campaign to blame Russia for hacking the DNC. Nor do we know how candid the denizens of CIA’s Digital Innovation Directorate have been with you and with Director Pompeo. These are areas that might profit from early White House review.  [ President Trump then directed Pompeo to invite Binney, one of the authors of the July 24, 2017 VIPS Memorandum to the President, to discuss all this.  Binney and Pompeo spent an hour together at CIA Headquarters on October 24, 2017, during which Binney briefed Pompeo with his customary straightforwardness. ]“We also do not know if you have discussed cyber issues in any detail with President Putin. In his interview with NBC’s Megyn Kelly he seemed quite willing – perhaps even eager – to address issues related to the kind of cyber tools revealed in the Vault 7 disclosures, if only to indicate he has been briefed on them. Putin pointed out that today’s technology enables hacking to be ‘masked and camouflaged to an extent that no one can understand the origin’ [of the hack] … And, vice versa, it is possible to set up any entity or any individual that everyone will think that they are the exact source of that attack.

“‘Hackers may be anywhere,’ he said. ‘There may be hackers, by the way, in the United States who very craftily and professionally passed the buck to Russia. Can’t you imagine such a scenario? … I can.’

New attention has been drawn to these issues after I discussed them in a widely published 16-minute interview last Friday.In view of the highly politicized environment surrounding these issues, I believe I must append here the same notice that VIPS felt compelled to add to our key Memorandum of July 24, 2017:“Full Disclosure: Over recent decades the ethos of our intelligence profession has eroded in the public mind to the point that agenda-free analysis is deemed well nigh impossible. Thus, we add this disclaimer, which applies to everything we in VIPS say and do: We have no political agenda; our sole purpose is to spread truth around and, when necessary, hold to account our former intelligence colleagues.“We speak and write without fear or favor. Consequently, any resemblance between what we say and what presidents, politicians and pundits say is purely coincidental.” The fact we find it is necessary to include that reminder speaks volumes about these highly politicized times.

Ray McGovern was a CIA analyst for 27 years and co-founded Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

Opmerking: Zie deze week bij de Stem van de Straat-Amsterdam-Noir/SaltoTV  (afl 21, 2018 (Video) voor de MH17 leugens van de ‘VVD-Aasgier Blok’ bij de VN en ‘CIA Trol-Arkady Babchenko ‘(Video) en de VVD dief van één miljoen euro Burgemeester Krikke betrapt met een ons cocaïne en 2 ton cash aan steekpenningen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 antwoorden »

    • Het kleine, weerloze Syrië heeft op heldhaftige wijze standgehouden tegen de Angelsaksische, zionistische wereldoverheersing. Dankzij zijn innerlijke eenheid en dankzij zijn bondgenoten, vooral Rusland. Dat zei pater Daniël Maes tijdens het openingscongres van het Geopolitiek Instituut Vlaanderen-Nederland (GIVN).

      Like

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Twitter-afbeelding

Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit /  Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s