( van onze ‘US-Killer-Elite’ redactie)
AMSTERDAM-NOIR-Tulsi Gabbard komt op voor het ‘Vrije internet-Media’ en tegen het ‘War Mongul-Fake News’ van CNN, BCC en de NOS(video).
Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard has announced her intent to campaign for President of the United States, and the entire political spectrum is shitting bricks about it. Mainstream liberals and neocons are calling her a Putin puppet and Assad’s BFF, leftists and progressives are criticizing her associations with right-wing factions in India and anti-LGBT comments she made in the early 2000s, conspiracy analysts are criticizing her Council on Foreign Relations membership, and the Zionist elements of ‘Mad Dog Chil-Killer-Trump’s’ base are openly promising to destroy her candidacy.
NewsGuard and D66 ‘DDR Minister Ollongren’ Launches War on Alternative Media like Volksnieuws-Amsterdam-Noir en de Stem van de Straat-Amsterdam-Noir/SaltoTV(Video).
Congresswoman & Hero & Surfer Gabbard slammed Trump and his ‘Puppet-Shell- Rutte’ or Protecting &Helping Al-Qaeda in Syria(Video).
A lot of others, myself included, got a lot more interested in the 2020 elections when she threw her hat in.I’m not interested in defending Gabbard from the criticisms that have been leveled at her at this time; many articles have been written toward that end already, and if she’s going to run for the most powerful elected office on the planet it’s fair to scrutinize and question what kind of person she is. I’m also not interested in endorsing anyone for the presidency. What I am interested in is the way Gabbard’s presence in the Democratic presidential primary race is already in January 2019 upsetting the standard corrupt establishment script and forcing foreign policy debates that need to happen.
Here are a five thoughts on that subject:
1 — Gabbard will definitely be the most antiwar candidate on the debate stage by a wide margin, except in the highly unlikely event that someone steps up from way out of left field to run like Dennis Kucinich. Being the most antiwar candidate in anything associated with the Democratic Party is a very low bar, but her vocal positions on Syria,Iran,Yemen,Russia,North Korea,Afghanistan,Gaza, and previous US-Killer-Elite regime change interventionsset her so far from the establishment orthodoxy that she’ll look as different from the other candidates as Ron Paul looked on the Republican debate stage.
2 — Make no mistake, it is this opposition to significant aspects of the ‘US-Killer-Elite -war machine’ that is the driving force behind the overwhelming bulk of the shrieking objection to Gabbard’s candidacy, not any of the more valid criticisms. We have learned from the mainstream acceptance of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez that some criticism of the status quo will be tolerated when it comes to domestic policy, but it’s an excommunicable offense when it comes to foreign policy. The idea that the ‘US-Killer-Elite’ should forcefully control world affairs using the carrot of alliance and the stick of military violence is so ubiquitous in both of America’s mainstream parties that it takes a Washington Postcolumnist getting dismembered alive to start a debate about something so self-evidently evil as the Saudi-led destruction of Yemen.
3 — Foreign policy is undeniably the area in which the greater part of ‘US-Killer-Elite-government’ depravity takes place, and as far as America’s permanent government is concerned it is by far the most important. Forcing a debate on an issue you’re not even supposed to bring up on mainstream media will get a lot of ordinary Americans asking questions that very powerful individuals don’t want asked. The DNC went from scheduling over 20 debates in 2008 to trying to limit it to six in 2016because they didn’t want Sanders’ excellent domestic policy ideas getting out to the public and making their coronated status quo candidate look bad. Gabbard could have the same impact on foreign policy in an audience that has been aggressively propagandizedby MSNBC warmongering.
4 — Gabbard’s progressive positions on issues like Medicare for All, environmentalism,$15 minimum wage,Wall Street accountability, the failed war on drugs, marijuana legalization, criminal justice reformand indigenous water rightswill also set her further to the left on domestic policy than anyone on the debate stage besides Sanders should he run. This is a self-evident fact, but a lot of narrative control efforts are being poured into painting her as a right-winger. She will definitely help force the debate to the left, and her position on withdrawing from expensive interventionist war policies answers the “But how are you going to PAY for it??” questions the MSM talking heads are so fond of grilling progressives with on social programs.
5 — For me the most telling thing about Gabbard is the way she resigned from her position as vice chair of the DNCin order to endorse Bernie Sanders in 2016. Other DNC operatives remained inside the Committee and actively schemedto give Clinton every unfair advantage in the primary, but Gabbard showed integrity and refused to advance a biased agenda in violation of the DNC charter. It showed that she’s a real person operating within one of the phoniest places in the world, and that she’s willing to throw a spanner in the works of the machine when it’s in the highest interest. This unwillingness to march to the beat of the establishment drum for such proceedings could lead to some very interesting things as the presidential race heats up.
And that’s good enough for me. She’s not perfect, she’s a major long shot to actually win, but Tulsi Gabbard’s campaign for president will definitely shake things up in all the right places, and good things will come from it. Which is why all the right people are outraged by her bid today.